dear people of the jury
Second was King James of England was Catholic so did not want neither the people nor the parliament but did English constitutionalism allowed the right of freedom? The king's Catholicism was another way to express their religious inclinations, and yet not given the right to freedom. The answer to the previous question was yes, if they accept freedom of expression as long as no conflict with their ideology. The parliament was not chosen by the people but by the nobles and the king did something better was an indulgence of religious freedom.
The king married a Catholic princess and so she demanded when nobody had to do it because I was free to decide whom to marry and was surrounded by Catholic officials and also why he demanded but he also was free to choose people in England was going to be afraid of being betrayed by hatred of them because they were more likely to betray or Catholics who people would trust that is less likely to betray.
The king also was sentenced to death but what English constitutionalism does not give the right to life? Yes, if they have the right to life but is not entitled a Catholic but if given the right to liberty and life Why do not you gave the king the right? Just because you were discriminated against as a Catholic for that and why not let him live in his castle locked up? Because he was Catholic
Essay by senegoid ademordna
Read 512 times
Written on 2010-06-29 at 04:23
Save as a bookmark (requires login)
Write a comment (requires login)
Send as email (requires login)
Print text
King James II
Second was King James of England was Catholic so did not want neither the people nor the parliament but did English constitutionalism allowed the right of freedom? The king's Catholicism was another way to express their religious inclinations, and yet not given the right to freedom. The answer to the previous question was yes, if they accept freedom of expression as long as no conflict with their ideology. The parliament was not chosen by the people but by the nobles and the king did something better was an indulgence of religious freedom.
The king married a Catholic princess and so she demanded when nobody had to do it because I was free to decide whom to marry and was surrounded by Catholic officials and also why he demanded but he also was free to choose people in England was going to be afraid of being betrayed by hatred of them because they were more likely to betray or Catholics who people would trust that is less likely to betray.
The king also was sentenced to death but what English constitutionalism does not give the right to life? Yes, if they have the right to life but is not entitled a Catholic but if given the right to liberty and life Why do not you gave the king the right? Just because you were discriminated against as a Catholic for that and why not let him live in his castle locked up? Because he was Catholic
Essay by senegoid ademordna
Read 512 times
Written on 2010-06-29 at 04:23
Save as a bookmark (requires login) Write a comment (requires login) Send as email (requires login) Print text
|
jenks |
| Texts |
 by senegoid ademordna Latest textsWhy?black angel angel negro The aluminum pluton El pluton de aluminio |
Increase font
Decrease